Three Court Master, L.P. v. UBS, AG Stamford Branch
1:25-cv-07679 · Southern District of New York
WHAT HAPPENED — IN PLAIN ENGLISH
Three new filings occurred between April 30 and May 7, 2004: Entry #129 shows Bin Laden family members and Saudi Binladin Group seeking to file opposition to intervention in a related Burnett action, Entry #130 is insurance companies responding to that motion, and Entry #131 is SNCB entities requesting deadline extension. This creates competing motion practice around intervention rights in a related case while simultaneously extending discovery deadlines in this matter until June 30, 2004. No immediate action is required before 9 AM as all current motions are pending judicial review with the next return date set for June 30, 2004.
Updated 2026-03-31 02:00:01
Did this help?
This would cost $450 from a lawyer
Ada is free because people like you keep it running.
100% of contributions fund free legal intelligence for people who can't afford a lawyer. Lesson of the Day, PBC.
YOUR CASE FILE
Entry #129 (Apr 30): Bakr M. Bin Laden, Omar M. Bin Laden, Tarek M. Bin Laden, Khaled Bin Salim Bin Mahfouz, and Saudi Binladin Group filed motion for leave to file memorandum opposing intervention in related Burnett action (03-CV-9849)
Entry #130 (May 5): Federal Insurance Company, Pacific Indemnity Company, and Vigilant Insurance Company filed response opposing the Bin Laden parties' motion for leave
Entry #131 (May 7): SNCB Corporate Finance Ltd. and SNCB Securities Ltd. filed motion for extension of time to respond to complaint with return date of June 30, 2004
Document #129 includes attachment with letter from S. Brogan to R. Motley dated April 13, 2004
WHAT THE OTHER SIDE DID
The Bin Laden defendants are actively fighting to prevent intervention in a related case (Burnett action), suggesting they want to limit the number of parties pursuing claims against them and may be concerned about coordination between plaintiff groups
Insurance companies are opposing the Bin Laden motion, indicating potential coverage disputes and suggesting the insurers may benefit from broader litigation that could establish liability patterns
WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOUR CASE
This case involves multiple related actions with complex intervention issues that could affect our client's ability to coordinate with other plaintiffs or access discovery from the Burnett matter
The SNCB extension request suggests defendants are still organizing their defense strategy, creating an opportunity to press for early discovery advantages before they fully coordinate
Get daily updates on this case
Get all of this delivered to your inbox at 5 AM.
Free ($0/mo): Everything Ada knows — all 4 layers on the page and in email. What happened, your case file, what the other side did, what it means.
Personal ($19/mo): Everything in Free, delivered daily at 5 AM — plus deadline alerts. Ada warns you 7 days, 3 days, and 1 day before any court deadline. Never miss a filing date.
Multi ($49/mo): Everything in Personal for up to 5 cases. Perfect for small business owners, repeat litigants, or family law.
Professional ($299/mo): For legal teams and executive assistants. Unlimited cases, white-label, custom sources.