ADA

Matthew Stein v. Skatteforvaltningen

1:23-cv-02508 · Southern District of New York
WHAT HAPPENED — IN PLAIN ENGLISH

The parties exchanged competing letters regarding pretrial evidentiary objections, with plaintiff's counsel filing Rule 26(a)(3)(B) objections on April 22 (Entry #178) and testimony admission objections on April 25 (Entry #179), followed by defendant Skatteforvaltningen's response on April 28 (Entry #180). This suggests the case is in final pretrial preparation phase with active disputes over what evidence and testimony will be admitted at trial. No immediate action is required before 9 AM as these are informational letter briefs to the court rather than motions requiring response deadlines.

Updated 2026-03-30 22:36:09

Did this help?

This would cost $450 from a lawyer

Ada is free because people like you keep it running.

100% of contributions fund free legal intelligence for people who can't afford a lawyer. Lesson of the Day, PBC.

YOUR CASE FILE
  • Entry #178 (Apr 22): Daniel W. Levy filed Rule 26(a)(3)(B) pretrial disclosure objections on behalf of plaintiffs Stein and Lhote
  • Entry #179 (Apr 25): Same counsel filed additional letter objecting to admission of testimony
  • Entry #180 (Apr 28): Marc A. Weinstein responded for defendant Skatteforvaltningen, directly addressing the April 25 letter
  • All filings are letter briefs to Judge Buchwald rather than formal motions, suggesting streamlined pretrial dispute resolution process
WHAT THE OTHER SIDE DID
  • The timing shows active pretrial maneuvering with Skatteforvaltningen responding within 3 days, indicating both sides are engaged and preparing aggressively for trial
  • Plaintiffs filed two separate objection letters within 3 days, suggesting either strategic escalation or discovery of additional problematic evidence/testimony as trial approaches
WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOUR CASE
  • The evidentiary disputes signal this case is proceeding to trial rather than settlement, requiring full trial preparation and witness/exhibit finalization
  • Multiple objections from plaintiffs may indicate defendant has strong evidence or expert testimony that plaintiffs are trying to exclude before trial

Get daily updates on this case

Get all of this delivered to your inbox at 5 AM.

Free ($0/mo): Everything Ada knows — all 4 layers on the page and in email. What happened, your case file, what the other side did, what it means.

Personal ($19/mo): Everything in Free, delivered daily at 5 AM — plus deadline alerts. Ada warns you 7 days, 3 days, and 1 day before any court deadline. Never miss a filing date.

Multi ($49/mo): Everything in Personal for up to 5 cases. Perfect for small business owners, repeat litigants, or family law.

Professional ($299/mo): For legal teams and executive assistants. Unlimited cases, white-label, custom sources.